Difference between revisions of "Man's laws"
From XFamily - Children of God
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A term often used by [[David Berg]] as a diminuitive for laws with which he did not agree. He claimed his writings were the [[word]] of God and the clear implications were that his opinion superceded "man's laws". | A term often used by [[David Berg]] as a diminuitive for laws with which he did not agree. He claimed his writings were the [[word]] of God and the clear implications were that his opinion superceded "man's laws". | ||
| − | This was most commonly used to attempt to undermine sexual prohibitions such as [[pedophillia]] or [[incest]] and was often combined with the [[Natural law|naturalistic fallacy]]. | + | This was most commonly used to attempt to undermine sexual prohibitions such as [[:Category:Pedophillia|pedophillia]] or [[:Category:Incest|incest]] and was often combined with the [[Natural law|naturalistic fallacy]]. |
Revision as of 07:32, 7 April 2005
A term often used by David Berg as a diminuitive for laws with which he did not agree. He claimed his writings were the word of God and the clear implications were that his opinion superceded "man's laws".
This was most commonly used to attempt to undermine sexual prohibitions such as pedophillia or incest and was often combined with the naturalistic fallacy.
