Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
From XFamily - Children of God
m (removed layout-related comment by me (I'll take this up on the editor's forum)) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*What do you all think about moving most of the content off of the home page and making the home page rely on layout and navigation to be a gateway to the content? We could probably cut down on the home page a lot and make it more useful as we scale. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 01:00, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | *What do you all think about moving most of the content off of the home page and making the home page rely on layout and navigation to be a gateway to the content? We could probably cut down on the home page a lot and make it more useful as we scale. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 01:00, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
**I agree. IMO there is currently far too much text on the home page. --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 07:37, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | **I agree. IMO there is currently far too much text on the home page. --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 07:37, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
***I've started moving content off, and encourage other editors to help in this reorganization. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 21:11, 24 Mar 2005 (CST) | ***I've started moving content off, and encourage other editors to help in this reorganization. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 21:11, 24 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | ****I have moved some content to [[Main_Page_OLD]] --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 00:50, 19 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *I propose moving the glossary link further down the page, as our content has grown to the point that its merit (to be prominently featured) has diminished. I propose it here instead of just moving it merely because I don't have time to think about where it should go. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 21:37, 29 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
*I added the 'favicon.ico' icon to the path (see xF in URL box). This was a '''super''' quick and lazy creation. If anyone has ideas on a better version, let me know and I can generate one (or they can do it themselves). This is, of course, not an important addition . . . just something for the aesthetics of the site. Also, are our "colours" #332E87 and #BBBBBB? —[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] 23:00, 13 Mar 2005 (CST) | *I added the 'favicon.ico' icon to the path (see xF in URL box). This was a '''super''' quick and lazy creation. If anyone has ideas on a better version, let me know and I can generate one (or they can do it themselves). This is, of course, not an important addition . . . just something for the aesthetics of the site. Also, are our "colours" #332E87 and #BBBBBB? —[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] 23:00, 13 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 05:50, 19 May 2005
- What do you all think about moving most of the content off of the home page and making the home page rely on layout and navigation to be a gateway to the content? We could probably cut down on the home page a lot and make it more useful as we scale. --Craven de Kere 01:00, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I agree. IMO there is currently far too much text on the home page. --Monger 07:37, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I've started moving content off, and encourage other editors to help in this reorganization. --Craven de Kere 21:11, 24 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I have moved some content to Main_Page_OLD --Craven de Kere 00:50, 19 May 2005 (CDT)
- I've started moving content off, and encourage other editors to help in this reorganization. --Craven de Kere 21:11, 24 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I agree. IMO there is currently far too much text on the home page. --Monger 07:37, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I propose moving the glossary link further down the page, as our content has grown to the point that its merit (to be prominently featured) has diminished. I propose it here instead of just moving it merely because I don't have time to think about where it should go. --Craven de Kere 21:37, 29 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I added the 'favicon.ico' icon to the path (see xF in URL box). This was a super quick and lazy creation. If anyone has ideas on a better version, let me know and I can generate one (or they can do it themselves). This is, of course, not an important addition . . . just something for the aesthetics of the site. Also, are our "colours" #332E87 and #BBBBBB? —Thorwald 23:00, 13 Mar 2005 (CST)
