Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Contents"
From XFamily - Children of God
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Re: public domain, in it's current incarnation what is suggested is illegal as you are invoking ''fair use'' liberally, to do so while making any such claim is legally illegitimate. Furthermore this website has not adopted a GPL and won't do so for legal reasons (though we also are not likely to mind if anyone uses the content). --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 16:59, 11 Mar 2005 (CST) | *Re: public domain, in it's current incarnation what is suggested is illegal as you are invoking ''fair use'' liberally, to do so while making any such claim is legally illegitimate. Furthermore this website has not adopted a GPL and won't do so for legal reasons (though we also are not likely to mind if anyone uses the content). --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 16:59, 11 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | **Edit: The word "eligible" helps, but I think it best not to license at all. We wouldn't obstruct the use of the material but it may be safer not to make claims about it. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 20:30, 11 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 02:30, 12 March 2005
- Re: public domain, in it's current incarnation what is suggested is illegal as you are invoking fair use liberally, to do so while making any such claim is legally illegitimate. Furthermore this website has not adopted a GPL and won't do so for legal reasons (though we also are not likely to mind if anyone uses the content). --Craven de Kere 16:59, 11 Mar 2005 (CST)
- Edit: The word "eligible" helps, but I think it best not to license at all. We wouldn't obstruct the use of the material but it may be safer not to make claims about it. --Craven de Kere 20:30, 11 Mar 2005 (CST)
