Difference between revisions of "Talk:Christian Research Journal: Inside the "Heavenly Elite""

Revision as of 05:02, 13 September 2005

I vote this the worst-researched article I've read on the COG/TFI to date. Did we ever come up with a system for rating news articles for content quality / accuracy? WalkerJ 22:42, 12 Sep 2005 (CDT)
- I would prefer not to use a rating system, as its objectivity would be difficult to ensure. However, I have been planning to "factcheck" these articles and publications and suggest we do so. In cases where there are clear factual error we should point them out. In cases where we believe academic standards are shoddy we should make that case, etc. --Craven de Kere 00:02, 13 Sep 2005 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:42, 13 September 2005 (view source) WalkerJ (talk \| contribs) (Question about rating.)		Revision as of 05:02, 13 September 2005 (view source) Craven de Kere (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I vote this the worst-researched article I've read on the COG/TFI to date. Did we ever come up with a system for rating news articles for content quality / accuracy? [[User:WalkerJ\|WalkerJ]] 22:42, 12 Sep 2005 (CDT)	+	*I vote this the worst-researched article I've read on the COG/TFI to date. Did we ever come up with a system for rating news articles for content quality / accuracy? [[User:WalkerJ\|WalkerJ]] 22:42, 12 Sep 2005 (CDT)
		+	**I would prefer not to use a rating system, as its objectivity would be difficult to ensure. However, I have been planning to "factcheck" these articles and publications and suggest we do so. In cases where there are clear factual error we should point them out. In cases where we believe academic standards are shoddy we should make that case, etc. --[[User:Craven de Kere\|Craven de Kere]] 00:02, 13 Sep 2005 (CDT)