Template talk:LeadershipStructure
From XFamily - Children of God
- IMO, Creations, FCF, Aurora, and Production Centers don't belong in a Family Leadership Structure table. As for the triad of top leaders, two possible ways to handle them would be to either just list them by name, or add Royal Family and make special mention of Perfilio under World Services. --Monger 12:38, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- I suppose you are right about Creations et al. It would be nice to have a category/template for them. Somehow it would be nice to show the structure of TFI in general. I don't like the idea of "Royal Family", but if the others agree, I am fine. Perfilio is above WS but below Zerby and Kelly. Kinda the odd-member-out. Ideas? --Thorwald 12:56, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- Just list them by name then (at least until we come up with another idea...and the template concept makes updating it easy). And yeah, Creations et al should go, though they should probably be grouped into some kind of Major Family Projects and Fronts template (though ideally with a better title). --Monger 13:09, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- I don't see any problem with listing Samuel Perfilio under "Royal Family". If I'm not mistaken, he replaced Gary as the Prime Minister. I could be wrong about that, though. --WalkerJ 20:23, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- Just list them by name then (at least until we come up with another idea...and the template concept makes updating it easy). And yeah, Creations et al should go, though they should probably be grouped into some kind of Major Family Projects and Fronts template (though ideally with a better title). --Monger 13:09, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
- I suppose you are right about Creations et al. It would be nice to have a category/template for them. Somehow it would be nice to show the structure of TFI in general. I don't like the idea of "Royal Family", but if the others agree, I am fine. Perfilio is above WS but below Zerby and Kelly. Kinda the odd-member-out. Ideas? --Thorwald 12:56, 23 Oct 2005 (CDT)
